Agent Upfits

Contact Us for a Free Estimate!

Contact Us for a Free Estimate!

Both are great issue trackers, especially when connected with a visual bug tracker like Usersnap. GitLab CI offers Auto DevOps which automatically runs CI/CD without a human being actually setting it up. And if you are already used to an external CI, you can obviously integrate with Jenkins, Codeship, and others. Now, we’re taking it a step further to unite development and operations in one user experience.

End-to-end metrics and visibility across the software delivery lifecycle

And its popularity is mainly driven by the highly active GitHub community of millions of developers. You can discuss problems and maybe learn a few unofficial difference between gitlab and github but awesome hacks there. On the other hand, GitLab undertook some great activities, such as hosting community events and connecting open source contributors.

DevOps for Telco Industry!

Developers who like one-stop shopping will probably like GitLab a little better. But in terms of meeting developers’ functionality requirements, there are not huge differences between the platforms. Although GitHub is currently the most popular platform for developers, it’s not really accurate to say that GitHub offers any more or less support for developers than GitLab does.

  1. So, there’s a reason why so many VCS services have “Git” in their names.
  2. GitHub offers similar tools, including code scanning, code QL, and dependabot for dependency scanning.
  3. GitLab took a similar path and offers multiple integrations for development and DevOps teams.

It generally only adds data, which means that change history is retained

So, the only way to know which platform is best for your next project is to try them out and see which one matches well with your workflow. In the end, both platforms are powerful options that are here to stay. Both GitLab and GitHub allow you to create repositories for your code, manage permissions, and collaborate with other developers on projects.

GitLab vs. GitHub: Features Compared

While GitHub has a lot of great third-party integrations and workarounds for DevOps workflow and CI/CD, GitLab allows you to do all of that within its platform. Consider incorporating Usersnap, a visual user feedback and bug tracking tool used by companies like Facebook and Microsoft. If you’re looking for the biggest community of developers, chances are high that GitHub is the better place to be. Both GitLab and GitHub support a wide range of third-party integrations, enhancing workflow efficiency.

Choosing a DevSecOps platform should mean choosing the clouds that fit your business and technology strategy. Since GitLab isn’t commercially tied to any specific cloud provider, you can de-risk your multi-cloud strategy and avoid being locked into a single vendor. The second key difference is that GitLab offers its own deployment platform built on Kubernetes. With GitHub you would need to use an external platform, like AWS or Heroku and trigger your deploys there. The vast majority of developers, teams, and companies use these tools to ensure that every piece of code is reviewed carefully before going live, and that nobody’s contribution disappears.

When real traffic began after deployment, the Gitaly node had trouble syncing the monorepo with the other nodes in the cluster. We deployed key parts like Gitaly, Praefect, Sidekiq, App Servers, Network File System (NFS) server, and Elasticsearch in a specific sequence. Starting with Gitaly, followed by Praefect, then Sidekiq and App Servers, and finally NFS and Elasticsearch. Our thorough testing showed this order to be the most dependable and safe.

For example, you can customize the interface, set up a custom workflow, create your own GitLab CI runner, etc. Both platforms generally aim to maintain a high level of uptime, typically around 99.9% or higher. However, the average uptime of both GitHub and GitLab can vary over time due to factors like maintenance, updates, or unexpected outages. You can view the image sources below the prices to see the specifics of each plan and what they have to offer.

Iron Mountain sees GitLab as an important part of Enterprise Architecture and Platforms’ enablement of agile methods and helpful to the company’s evolution to DevOps. GitLab Ultimate SaaS does the maintenance, so developers can focus on development, reducing 20 hours of onboarding time per project and around $150,000 in cost savings per year. The team at Chorus credits GitLab for helping them improve their feature cycle analytics. By having test results, security reviews, performance tests, the code climate, and everything in the merge requests, Chorus has been able to move quickly. 95% of executive respondents said privacy and protection of intellectual property are important when evaluating an AI tool or feature.

Both platforms give users the ability to track a team’s progress regarding their respective projects. Plus, some features allow leaders to appoint members to do specific tasks or solve certain issues as required by the overall task. The primary value that it presents lies in how developers make software solutions. DevOps is a relatively young field, and each part of its life cycle has evolved to need its specific tools and platforms. However, even the most advanced workflows are highly inefficient if they rely on multiple separate coding tools to conduct the entire complex life cycle of development.

GitLab presents a built-in solution for deployment, utilizing Kubernetes or K8s to automate this process. This feature is built-in and can be accessed directly from the platform, streamlining the deployment experience with a few clicks. Meanwhile, GitHub also has three pricing categories; Free, Team, and Enterprise. However, GitHub doesn’t have open-source accessibility, although the Free version does offer free repositories. If you want private repositories, though, you’re going to have to pay a premium. So, whether GitLab or GitHub is better for developers boils down mainly to preference.

The main branch is always ready to deploy, ensuring that you can quickly reinstate the status quo if something goes wrong. While the underlying Git technology and features are virtually identical, the recommended workflow isn’t the same. One of the crucial things that makes this happen is the automated testing tool that automatically scans code for potential security risks. Working only within GitLab, your development team can focus on pushing minor updates live multiple times per day, rather than batching them into big releases. Neither GitHub nor GitLab offers dynamic server-side processing, as you’d need with PHP or ASP files. Both GitHub and GitLab offer free static web pages with information about your software project and repository.

With Kinsta, you can pull directly from your Git repository using SSH. While the screenshot above highlights GitHub, GitLab offers equally powerful code collaboration and review tools. But when it comes to the recommended workflow using these features, they’re pretty different. GitLab and GitHub have disparate views on an ideal coding workflow, and we’ll cover these differences in our next section. Most companies turn to cloud-based solutions when working with larger remote or distributed teams.

Instead of hopping from tool to tool to code, solve issues, or collaborate, this platform provides an all-in-one space for developers to work for the entire life cycle of a DevOps project. But to accurately illustrate the difference between these two, we must also know about Git. GitLab is defined by its top-notch features — issue tracker, built-in CI/CD, deployment, and monitoring. All of these features enable you to go from development to cloud without having to use other 3rd party tools. The interface of GitHub is very user-friendly, making it easy for amateur coders to take advantage of Git.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.